Why the World Is Silent About Iran
And Why That Silence Is Not an Accident
One of the most painful questions people inside Iran keep asking is this:
“If what’s happening to us is so obvious, so brutal, so documented—why is the world silent?”
Human Rights Organizations Are Not as Independent as They Look
Many international human rights organizations present themselves as neutral, fearless watchdogs. In reality, a large number of them are funded directly or indirectly by governments—the same governments that balance human rights against oil, diplomacy, weapons contracts, regional stability, and political convenience.
When governments decide that speaking loudly about Iran is inconvenient, organizations dependent on those governments learn to speak softly, slowly, or not at all.
Media Silence Is a Business Decision
International media is not just journalism—it is an industry.
Editors worry about:
-
Access to officials
-
Advertising pressure
-
Political backlash
-
Visa restrictions
-
“Audience fatigue”
-
And, most importantly, staying on the right side of power
Iran doesn’t fit neatly into an easy headline cycle. Covering massacres without offering a clean geopolitical solution makes people uncomfortable. And discomfort doesn’t sell as well as digestible outrage.
Words matter. Silence often begins with word choice.
The Brutal Truth: Many Are Just Employees
This part is hard to hear, but it must be said.
They have:
-
Rent to pay
-
Families to feed
-
Careers to protect
-
Contracts to renew
Speaking out too loudly doesn’t make you brave in these systems—it makes you unemployable.
So they convince themselves:
-
“It’s complicated.”
-
“We need more verification.”
-
“Now is not the right time.”
-
“We’re working behind the scenes.”
And while they wait for the “right time,” people in Iran are buried.
Silence Does Not Mean They Don’t Know
It Means They Chose Safety Over Truth
There are videos. Names. Faces. Dates. Graves.
So What Does This Mean for Iranians?
It means one painful but empowering truth:
Waiting for permission from international institutions is a dead end.
Final Thought
It only exposes the moral bankruptcy of systems that prefer stability over justice—and paychecks over principles.

No comments:
Post a Comment